Vulnerability Remediation Process

Definition, implementation, importance and alternatives

Blog Vulnerability Remediation Process

| 5 min read

Contact us

The primary goal of vulnerability management is to reduce the risk to an organization. This is most effectively achieved by solving the latter's security issues. In this blog post, we define vulnerability remediation, talk about its implementation and importance, and differentiate it from vulnerability mitigation and acceptance.

What is vulnerability remediation?

The definition of vulnerability remediation is pretty straightforward. Still, we might have to agree on what a vulnerability is in the first place. Broadly speaking, it can be defined as a characteristic that renders an individual's or an organization's asset(s) (e.g., information systems) open to exploitation or susceptible to a given hazard. The vulnerability could be of the security posture, design, security procedures, internal controls, or the implementation of any of them.

Remediating a vulnerability is then to successfully correct it. Even though the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in its special publication 800-40r4 classifies what we call remediation into mitigation as a type of risk response, we argue there is a difference between vulnerability remediation and mitigation. We'll see the latter, along with vulnerability acceptance, as alternatives to remediation in vulnerability treatment, on which we expand below.

Vulnerability remediation steps

Treating vulnerabilities (either remediating, mitigating, or accepting them) is a stage of the broader vulnerability management cycle. Before this stage, the vulnerabilities, detected by automated security testing tools or manual techniques like penetration testing, should each have gone through evaluation and prioritization. There should then be an understanding of how exploitable each verified vulnerability is. It should also be known how easy it is to exploit it, whether the way to exploit it has been publicly available, and what the impact of its exploitation is. Basically, the risk it represents heavily guides the decision on how to treat the vulnerability.

When searching for steps in vulnerability remediation, you can find sources that mention not only the actual remediation as one of those steps but also actions previous to it, like identifying the vulnerability and evaluating its prioritization, and later actions, like monitoring for new weaknesses. We consider those other actions to be stages in a vulnerability management cycle rather than steps in remediation. Vulnerability remediation involves the appointed individual(s) correcting the issue in the previously agreed time frame. Following this, vulnerability reassessment should be performed to verify the effectiveness of remediation. Read a previous blog post to learn about the stages of vulnerability management.

Remediation may be done by modifying the characteristic so that it complies with security requirements. Examples are fixing proprietary source code and updating third-party software or libraries to their patched versions. Remediation may also involve making changes to configurations that are insecure. Such is the case when cloud services' configurations do not restrict access to sensitive resources, among other problems that may appear.

Remediation of high-risk vulnerabilities is especially important. Note that we've found using vulnerable software components to be the weakness that has exposed our client organizations the most to risk. So, patching third-party software and libraries should be at the top of the list. We also reported that our ethical hackers found critical severity vulnerabilities, whereas vulnerability scans couldn't. This suggests that it's these highly skilled security professionals who can give directions on how to remediate those vulnerabilities that deserve the most to be prioritized.

In our Documentation, we have our own standardization of security vulnerabilities, which we search for in our assessments. For every entry, we provide an example of compliant code and one of noncompliant code. This makes it a valuable resource when looking to remediate vulnerabilities.

Why is vulnerability remediation important?

Today's organizations being permanently exposed to threats is a major argument in stressing the importance of vulnerability remediation for system security. More than a thousand vulnerabilities are publicly disclosed every two weeks in the bulletins of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Further, malicious attackers are on the hunt all the time, looking to exploit the flaws found in software either recently or ages ago. Basically, Internet-facing assets are exposed to untrusted sources, and as the former grow in number, the chances to get breached increase. Organizations (and individuals) should perform continuous vulnerability assessment and remediation cycles to keep on resisting threats, which are constantly evolving.

Get started with Fluid Attacks' Vulnerability Management solution right now

Vulnerability remediation is also important as a key performance indicator (KPI) of an organization's vulnerability management program. For example, by tracking how much of the associated risk is being taken care of in a given time frame.

If it were not enough an incentive for organizations to secure their data and that of their users plus the availability of digital assets, there's also the motivation to comply with industry security standards. Compliance enables businesses to maintain their customers' trust, avoid fines and operate legitimately.

Granted, a challenge to vulnerability remediation is that organizations can see it as a process that is time consuming and therefore negatively affects productivity. However, they need to realize that taking the time needed to effectively manage risk can help them avoid incidents that end up being way more costly.

Vulnerability treatments while not remediating (yet)


Vulnerability mitigation

In order to most effectively manage the risk associated with a vulnerability, the most desirable course of action is to remediate the latter. But several factors may impede remediation. Maybe the patch for a vulnerable third-party software product is not yet available. Or maybe the limited resources need to be allocated to the remediation of some vulnerabilities in proprietary source code, delaying the remediation of others. Then, an option could be to deploy additional security controls (e.g., using technologies to isolate assets) to reduce the chances of exploiting the vulnerability whose remediation is being delayed.

The above option is a form of mitigation. Another one is, for example, in the case of a specific software feature that is flawed, to just disable the problematic characteristic. Yet another option could be to avoid risk, as NIST explains it, that is, eliminating the attack surface in question. A way to achieve this is by ditching vulnerable third-party software or libraries. Further, these components could be replaced with ones that are not vulnerable.

Vulnerability acceptance

In the course of managing a vulnerability, it might be the case that the risk it represents has to be accepted, either temporarily or permanently. The former is an option when other vulnerabilities need to be addressed first or a solution to the issue in question is not yet available. How much risk it represents may also be a reason for acceptance. If the risk is deemed low and therefore tolerable, according to the specific organization's policies or even compliance requirements of external entities, then the organization may choose to accept it for a while.

If in managing limited resources, the costs of remediation of the aforementioned vulnerability surpass those associated with its exploitation, then the organization may choose to tolerate that risk permanently. Yet another scenario is when the organization plans to stop offering a vulnerable software functionality or using a vulnerable third-party software or library, so it accepts the associated risk in the short period of time it takes to implement this change.

Accepting vulnerabilities is no taboo. Nevertheless, organizations should aim at reducing risk exposure as much as they can, and this is best achieved by remediating every vulnerability.

Manage vulnerability remediation from our platform

At Fluid Attacks, we perform security testing continuously and send vulnerability alerts to inform our client organizations of new issues in their systems found by our tool or ethical hackers. On our platform, stakeholders, including the developers responsible for remediation, can read detailed information about each vulnerability to understand how to go about remediating it. They can immediately take action. We help vulnerability treatment by letting them assign the remediation of individual vulnerabilities to members of their teams. Moreover, they can decide to accept a vulnerability temporarily and schedule its remediation or report that they are accepting it permanently or that it represents zero risk to them. In the most comprehensive of our plans, clients have access to several support options, one of which allows them to schedule meetings with our hackers to get advice on how to solve the most challenging vulnerabilities. (Learn about Continuous Hacking Advanced plan).

Want a taste of our Vulnerability Management solution? Start the 21-day free trial of our Continuous Hacking Essential plan, in which you can detect vulnerabilities in your software with our scanner and access our platform to manage them, among other things.

Subscribe to our blog

Sign up for Fluid Attacks' weekly newsletter.

Recommended blog posts

You might be interested in the following related posts.

Photo by Jasmin Egger on Unsplash

If the essential security layer is flawed, you're toast

Photo by Christian Wiediger on Unsplash

The need to enhance security within the fintech sector

Photo by Claudio Schwarz on Unsplash

Is your financial service as secure as you think?

Photo by mitchell kavan on Unsplash

Bringing the zero trust model to life

Photo by Brian Kelly on Unsplash

We need you, but we can't give you any money

Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash

Data breaches that left their mark on time

Photo by Roy Muz on Unsplash

Lessons learned from black swans

Start your 21-day free trial

Discover the benefits of our Continuous Hacking solution, which hundreds of organizations are already enjoying.

Start your 21-day free trial
Fluid Logo Footer

Hacking software for over 20 years

Fluid Attacks tests applications and other systems, covering all software development stages. Our team assists clients in quickly identifying and managing vulnerabilities to reduce the risk of incidents and deploy secure technology.

Copyright © 0 Fluid Attacks. We hack your software. All rights reserved.