LibSSH New Vulnerability

New vulnerability on libssh CVE-2018-10933

solution LibSSH New Vulnerability

October 18, 2018

The new vulnerability in LibSSH, tracked as CVE-2018-10933, resides on the server code which can enable a client to bypass the authentication process and create channels without permission. This affects servers using versions 0.6 and above being used in server mode.

The bug was discovered by Peter Winter-Smith of NCC Group, it’s like a jedi trick:

  • User: Let me in

  • Server: NO

  • User: I’m authenticated, let me in

  • Server: OK, YOU’RE IN

Why does this happen? Because of the way LibSSH checks for authentication when it receives an SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS message instead of the SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST message. It acts like the user is already authenticated, so an attacker could bypass the authentication and execute commands on the server.

Building the enviroment

How does LibSSH work? It’s a C library to implement SSHv2 protocol on the client and server side. First, we need to write our server-side code. We are going to use the sample that LibSSH has (samplesshd-cb.c) and modify it for our purposes.

In the ssh_channel_callbacks_struct we are going to put the following line in order to have the exec functionality:

exec request.

.channel_exec_request_function = exec_request


Next, add the exec_request function, this will take our commands and execute them on the server:

static int exec_nopty(const char *command) {
            /* exec the requested command. */
            execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", command, NULL);

    return SSH_OK;

static int exec_request(ssh_session session, ssh_channel channel,
                        const char *command, void *userdata) {

    printf("Allocated exec  \n");
    (void) userdata;
    (void) session;
    (void) channel;

    return exec_nopty(command);

If you have LibSSH with version 0.7.4 you can simply save it, compile it, and execute it. If not, you can use our method. We are going to use a docker container and install both versions (a vulnerable one and a patched one) and then, pass our code to the server and run it. The example files can be downloaded here.

To build the container, open a terminal in the folder of the Dockerfile and run this command:

host$ docker build -t fluidattackscve201810933 .

This will download all the necessary files and compile all the sources of LibSSH.

Then, to open the container simply run this command:

host$ docker run -it -p 2222:2222 fluidattackscve201810933:latest /bin/bash

This is going to mirror our port 2222 to the container port 2222 in order to be able to run our tests. Also, it will open a bash terminal on the container machine where we will run our LibSSH server.

Exploiting the vulnerability

In this case, we are going to use LibSSH v0.7.4 and test the solution with LibSSH v0.7.6. The PoC is on Python version 2, and you can check its source here, but if you downloaded our files, it’s there as

In order to run this PoC you will need paramiko. You can install it by running:

host$ pip install paramiko

In the container, run the following command to start the vulnerable LibSSH server:

container$ ./tmp/libssh-0.7.4/build/examples/samplesshd-cb -k ~/.ssh/id_dsa -k ~/.ssh/id_rsa -p 2222 --verbose

The verbose flag is to see what is sending and receiving our server.

Then, in your machine run the exploit with:

host$ python

If you check your container you can see this:


When the server is expecting the SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST, we are sending an SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS.


The server accepts it, and we bypassed the authentication. Then, we can send our commands to the server with:

cmd_channel.exec_command("whoami; id; ls -la /; ip addr")


The solution


The LibSSH version 0.7.6 doesn’t have this vulnerability. We can test it, too, in our container. We just need to run:

container$ ./tmp/libssh-0.7.6/build/examples/samplesshd-cb -k ~/.ssh/id_dsa -k ~/.ssh/id_rsa -p 2222 --verbose

And on our machine the exploit again:

host$ python


What’s happening? We send the SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS. The server receives it, but it won’t authenticate us because they added a validation on their code. When the packet is SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS, then, it checks for the authentication state. If it is not one of the valid states, it denies the packet.

Code on src/packet.c

Figure 1. Code on src/packet.c

Here you can see the difference between responses for a vulnerable version and a non-vulnerable one.


Figure 2. Vulnerable


Figure 3. Non-vulnerable

If you have LibSSH in your server, and you are using a server component, you should install the updated, or patched, versions of LibSSH.


Subscribe to our blog

Sign up for Fluid Attacks’ weekly newsletter.

Recommended blog posts

You might be interested in the following related posts.

Photo by Saketh Upadhya on Unsplash

Get an overview of vulnerability assessment

Photo by Anchor Lee on Unsplash

Benefits of continuous over point-in-time pentesting

Photo by Nik Shuliahin on Unsplash

For which security standards is pentesting a must-have?

Photo by Thomas Griggs on Unsplash

Pentesting is a system-agnostic approach to security

Photo by sebastiaan stam on Unsplash

Injecting JS into one site is harmful, into all, lethal

Photo by Dmitry Ratushny on Unsplash

Differences between these security testing approaches

Photo by Kostiantyn Li on Unsplash

Our CLI is an approved AST tool to secure cloud apps

Photo by Jeff Lemond on Unsplash

How BAS solutions work, their importance and benefits

Start your 21-day free trial

Discover benefits of our Continuous Hacking solution, which hundreds of organizations are already enjoying.

Start your 21-day free trial